Premium
Dose‐finding comparative study of 2 weeks of luliconazole cream treatment for tinea pedis – comparison between three groups (1%, 0.5%, 0.1%) by a multi‐center randomised double‐blind study
Author(s) -
Watanabe Shinichi,
Takahashi Hisashi,
Nishikawa Takeji,
Takiuchi Iwao,
Higashi Nobuhiko,
Nishimoto Katsutaro,
Kagawa Saburo,
Yamaguchi Hideyo,
Ogawa Hideoki
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
mycoses
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.13
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1439-0507
pISSN - 0933-7407
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01305.x
Subject(s) - medicine , incidence (geometry) , double blind , adverse effect , dermatology , exact test , significant difference , surgery , placebo , pathology , physics , alternative medicine , optics
Summary Luliconazole is a newly developed imidazolyl antifungal agent. A randomised double‐blind comparative study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of 1% luliconazole cream (group A), 0.5% cream (group B) and 0.1% cream (group C), in tinea pedis (interdigital type and plantar type), when used once daily for 2 weeks. Follow‐ups were performed at 4 weeks after the end of topical treatment. A total of 241 patients were enrolled and 213 patients were evaluated for efficacy. Rates of improvement of skin lesions in the A, B and C groups assessed at week 4 were 90.5%, 91.0% and 95.8%, respectively. Rates of mycological cure (negative result of microscopy) in the A, B and C groups assessed at week 4 were 79.7%, 76.1%, 72.2% and at week 6 (at 4 weeks after the end of topical treatment) were 87.7%, 94%, 88.9%, respectively. For the mycological effect on tinea pedis of the interdigital type at 2 weeks, the negative conversion of fungi showed a concentration‐dependent relationship and indicated a difference in tendency statistically 81.1% (1%– treatment), 62.9% (0.5%– treatment), 58.3% (0.1%– treatment) (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.079) and there was a trend between three groups by Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel method ( P = 0.038). The incidence of adverse events in which a causal relationship to this drug could not be ruled out was low (2.6%). All of the adverse events were mild in severity and insignificant clinically.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom