z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Untersuchung von Heterochronie in den Ossfikationssequenzen ausgewählter Froschlurche
Author(s) -
Weisbecker Vera,
Mitgutsch Christian
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of zoological systematics and evolutionary research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.769
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1439-0469
pISSN - 0947-5745
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2010.00570.x
Subject(s) - heterochrony , biology , neoteny , ossification , clade , phylogenetic tree , evolutionary biology , osteology , zoology , phylogenetics , anatomy , ontogeny , genetics , biochemistry , gene
Most anurans have a biphasic life cycle, which includes metamorphosis from a tadpole stage to an adult frog. This process involves extensive transformations of the cranial skeleton, which have been of long‐standing interest with respect to anuran skeletal evolution and taxonomy. In this study, large‐scale patterns of anuran skeletal ossification are assessed by collecting the most comprehensive data set on anuran cranial ossification to date from the literature, including data for 45 anuran and one caudate outgroup species. Ossification sequences were translated into event‐pair matrices for explorative phylogenetic analysis and phylogenetically informed parsimony search for heterochrony using the Parsimov algorithm. Rank variability of single bones across species was also analysed. Little phylogenetic signal was retrieved from a parsimony‐based phylogenetic analysis of event‐pairs, and only a few species that are generally agreed to be closely related are placed close to each other (e.g. some Pipidae and Costata). Parsimov analysis revealed some clade‐specific heterochrony in anuran clades of varying inclusiveness. Our results show that relating heterochronic changes in anuran cranial ontogeny to parameters such as direct development or miniaturization is problematic because of the high evolvability of cranial ossification sequences. Rank variation analysis suggests that anuran cranial bones are highly variable in their sequence positioning, possibly because tadpole and adult cranial morphology do not co‐evolve. Elements which are lost in some species ossify at the end of the sequence, providing evidence for the notion that failure of anuran cranial elements to ossify is due to processes of paedomorphosis.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here