Premium
Development of a Sensitive Serological Method for Specific Detection of Latent Infection of Macrophomina phaseolina in Cowpea
Author(s) -
Afouda Leonard,
Wolf Gerhard,
Wydra Kerstin
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of phytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.53
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1439-0434
pISSN - 0931-1785
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2008.01453.x
Subject(s) - macrophomina phaseolina , biology , sclerotinia sclerotiorum , mycelium , rhizoctonia solani , rhizoctonia , microbiology and biotechnology , sclerotium , fusarium oxysporum , botany
A double‐antibody sandwich enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (DAS‐ELISA) was developed for the specific detection and quantification of Macrophomina phaseolina in plant tissue. Both polyclonal antisera produced against immunogens from mycelium and culture filtrate of M. phaseolina detected the fungus in mycelial and plant extracts, although the antibodies raised against mycelium were more sensitive. No cross‐reaction occurred with Rhizopus stolonifer , Pythium ultimum , Mucor hiemalis , Fusarium oxysporum , Septoria nodorum , Rhizoctonia solani , Sclerotinia sclerotiorum , Phytophthora infestans and Aspergillus niger . In enzyme assays, activity of the endo‐acting hydrolytic enzymes 1,3‐β‐glucanase and, less, cellulase, but not xylanase was detected in infected plants. DAS‐ELISA was more sensitive than the 1,3‐β‐glucanase assay. In polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) up to 18 protein bands were observed, with four bands occurring in the 12 tested isolates deriving from various geographical origin in Niger and Nigeria. The enzyme assays and protein patterns were considered not suitable for specific M. phaseolina detection. Macrophomina phaseolina was essentially located in the roots and hypocotyls, and less in epicotyls and leaves of infected plants. The antibodies were also useful to detect latent infection and the infection of cowpea seeds.