Premium
Side‐Effects of Field Applications of ‘Propiconazol’ and ‘Captafol’ on the Composition of Non‐target Soil Fungi in Spring Barley
Author(s) -
Elmholt S.,
SmedegaardPetersen V.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
journal of phytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.53
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1439-0434
pISSN - 0931-1785
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1988.tb01039.x
Subject(s) - biology , cladosporium , fungicide , alternaria , botany , horticulture , spore , composition (language) , penicillium , linguistics , philosophy
The results show great seasonal variation in number and composition of the fungi isolated from the upper soil layer, especially owing to an increased isolation of primary saprophytic fungi during the late growing season. Before fungicide treatment no statistically significant difference was measured between the number of isolated fungi from the examined soils. During the treatment period significantly fewer fungi were isolated from plots treated with ‘captafol’ or ‘propiconazol’ than from the untreated plots. The differences between untreated and treated plots were not statistically significant 30 days after the last treatment. The ecotoxicological effect on the total isolated fungal flora thus seems negligible. However the fungi responded differen, tly to treatment with ‘captafol’ and ‘propiconazol’. None of the fungi were significantly affected for more than a month when treated with ‘propiconazol’. The number of primary saprophytic fungi ( Cladosporium spp., Alternaria spp., Epicoccum purpurascens , and Stemphylium sp.) and Sphaeropsidales, however, was significantly reduced for more than a month when treated with ‘captafol’.