Premium
Differential Influence of Ectomycorrhizae on Plant Growth and Disease Resistance in Pinus sylvestris Seedlings
Author(s) -
Chakravarty P.,
Unestam T.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
journal of phytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.53
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1439-0434
pISSN - 0931-1785
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1987.tb04423.x
Subject(s) - biology , mycorrhiza , pisolithus , ectomycorrhizae , seedling , botany , horticulture , rhizoctonia solani , symbiosis , genetics , bacteria
The influence of Laccaria laccata, Hebeloma crustuliniforme , and Pisolithus tinctorius mycorrhizae and a mixture of naturally occurring mycorrhizae on the resistance of Pinus sylvestris seedlings to attack by Fusarium moniliforme and Rhizoctonia solani was investigated periodically during an entire year under greenhouse conditions following inoculation with both mycobiont and pathogen. Using artificial root substrate the seedlings were provided with a balanced butlow nutrient supply. Seedling growth (dry weight) as well as short‐root formation was stimulated to different extents depending on the mycobiont species; in addition, the degree of stimulation varied over the year. Parasitized plants were more stimulated, than nonparasitized ones. Disease severity and plant mortality caused by either pathogen were drastically reduced in the presence of the mycorrhizal fungi, even before mycorrhiza formation. All mycorrhizae, except the association with Hebeloma , remained highly protective throughout the year; with Hebeloma it remained protective for only about 3 months. Growth stimulation or mycorrhiza frequency was not always correlated with the level of protection; e.g. Hebeloma protected withoutstimulating growth. Two types of protection apparently exist, one related to and another unrelated to growth stimulation. Mycorrhizal fungi had little or no antagonistic effects on fungal pathogens in vitro.