z-logo
Premium
Relationship between opercular girth, maximum girth and total length of fishes caught in gillnets in the estuarine and lower river sections of Shatt al‐Arab River (Basrah Province, Iraq)
Author(s) -
Jawad L. A.,
McKenzie A.,
AlNoor S. S.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of applied ichthyology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.392
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1439-0426
pISSN - 0175-8659
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01254.x
Subject(s) - girth (graph theory) , estuary , biology , fish <actinopterygii> , zoology , fishery , mathematics , veterinary medicine , combinatorics , medicine
Summary In fisheries, the two morphological parameters of opercular and maximum girth are related to the effectivity of capture methods in gilled and wedged fish, respectively. The present work investigates the relationship between opercular ( G ope ) and maximum girths ( G max ) to total length ( L t ) for 10 fish species captured from Shatt al‐Arab River, Basrah, Iraq. Data were collected October 2005 to December 2006. Cyprinids were the best represented family with six species; engraulids, silurids, heteropneustids and mugilids were each represented by one species. G ope and G max were found to increase linearly with total length of all species, all r 2 values being greater than 0.73 and statistically significant (P < 0.01). When G ope and G max for all species were plotted against total length, two groups were identified ( G 1, G 2), corresponding to general girth‐length relationships: (a) G 1 = −0.252 + 0.424 L t and G 2 = −0.262  +  0.600 L t for opercular girth and, (b) G 1 = 1.538 + 0.419 L t and G 2  =  1.538  +  0.696 L t for maximum girth. These groups correspond to different body shapes of fishes: G 1‐round and G 2‐compressed. These relationships have implications when using length data and mesh size to determine size selectivity of gill nets.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here