Premium
Fruit fly liquid larval diet technology transfer and update
Author(s) -
Chang C. L.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of applied entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.795
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1439-0418
pISSN - 0931-2048
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2008.01345.x
Subject(s) - ceratitis capitata , tephritidae , bactrocera , capitata , bactrocera dorsalis , dacus , biology , larva , sterile insect technique , agriculture , horticulture , pest analysis , botany , ecology , brassica oleracea
Since October 2006, the US Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service (USDA–ARS) has been implementing a fruit fly liquid larval diet technology transfer, which has proceeded according to the following steps: (1) recruitment of interested groups through request; (2) establishment of the Material Transfer Agreement with agricultural research service; (3) fruit fly liquid larval diet starter kit sent to the requestor for preliminary evaluation; (4) problem‐solving through email or onsite demonstration; (5) assessment on feedback from the participants to decide whether to continue the project. Up to date, the project has involved 35 participants from 29 countries and 26 species of fruit flies. Fourteen participants have concluded their evaluation of the process, and 11 of these 14, have deemed it to be successful. One participant has decided to implement the project on a larger scale. The 14 participants were, Argentina ( Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus ), Bangladesh ( Bactrocera cucurbitae , C. capitata , and Bactrocera dorsalis ), China (Fujia province) ( B. dorsalis ), Italy ( C. capitata ), Fiji ( Bactrocera passiflorae ), Kenya ( Bactrocera invadens, Ceratitis cosyra ), Mauritius ( Bactrocera zonata and B. cucurbitae ), Mexico ( Anastrepha species), Philippines ( Bactrocera philippinese ), Thailand ( Bactrocera correcta ), Austria ( C. capitata , Vienna 8 and A. fraterculus ), Israel ( Dacus ciliatus and C. capitata ), South Africa ( C. capitata , Vienna 8) and Australia ( C. capitata ). The Stellenbosch medfly mass‐rearing facility in South Africa and the CDFA in Hawaii were two mass‐scale rearing facilities that allowed us to demonstrate onsite rearing in a larger scale. Demonstrations were performed in CDFA in 2007, and in Stellenbosch, South Africa in 2008; both were found to be successful. The Stellenbosch medfly mass‐rearing facility in South Africa decided to adopt the technology and is currently evaluating the quality control of the flies that were reared as larvae on a liquid diet.