Premium
Responses of Some Newly Developed Salt‐tolerant Genotypes of Spring Wheat to Salt Stress: 1. Yield Components and Ion Distribution
Author(s) -
Ashraf M.,
O'leary J. W.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of agronomy and crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.095
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1439-037X
pISSN - 0931-2250
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-037x.1996.tb00451.x
Subject(s) - cultivar , yield (engineering) , salt (chemistry) , salinity , poaceae , agronomy , horticulture , chemistry , grain yield , biology , materials science , ecology , metallurgy
The degree of salt tolerance of two newly developed genotypes of spring wheat, S24 and S36 was assessed with respect to their parents, LU26S (from Pakistan) and Kharchia (from India). These four lines along with a salt‐tolerant genotype SARC‐1 and two salt‐sensitive cvs Potohar and Yecora Rojo were subjected to salinized sand culture containing 0, 125 or 250 mol m −3 NaCl in full strength Hoagland's nutrient solution. S24 produced significantly greater grain yield and had greater 1000 seed weight and number of tillers per plant than those of the other cultivars /lines. S36 was not significantly different from its parents in seed yield and yield components. SARC‐1 was the second highest in grain yield of all cultivars/lines, but it did not differ significantly from LU26S and Kharchia in 1000 seed weight and number of tillers per plant. The greater degree of salt tolerance of S24 could be related to its lower accumulation of Na + in the leaves and maintenance of higher leaf K/Na ratios and K versus Na selectivity as compared to its parents. S36, which was as good as its parents in growth, also had lower Na + and higher K/Na ratios and K versus Na selectivity in the leaves at the highest salt level than those in its parents. SARC‐1 did not differ from LU26S and Kharchia in ionic content or K/Na ratios and K versus Na selectivities of both leaves and roots. Both the salt‐sensitive cultivars, Potohar and Yecora Rojo, had significantly greater leaf Na + and Cl − concentrations and lower leaf K/Na ratios and K versus Na selectivities than all the salt‐tolerant lines examined in this study. From this study it is evident that improvement in salt tolerance of spring wheat is possible through selection and breeding, and pattern of ion accumulation is not consistent among the salt‐tolerant genotypes in relation to their degree of salt tolerance.