Pecking but Accepting the Parasitic Eggs may not Reflect Ejection Failure: The Role of Motivation

The common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus , is an evictor brood parasite that generally reduces host fitness to zero, exerting strong selective pressure on hosts to evolve egg recognition and rejection. However, a great deal of variation in egg‐rejection efficiency exists, egg‐rejection behaviour being considered a flexible conditional response against parasitic eggs. Recently, it has been shown that some of the individuals that recognized (pecked) the parasitic egg finally accepted it. Here, we present the results of two egg‐recognition experiments made in two populations of rufous‐tailed scrub robins, Cercotrichas galactotes , in which one plaster model or a real house sparrow's egg, respectively, was experimentally introduced into their nests. The hosts' response was video recorded, allowing us to quantify the number of pecks, pecking strength, and ejection behaviour. We have found that rufous‐tailed scrub robin females ejected the model egg easily by grasping it after weakly pecking it; however, sometimes (55%) females pecked the experimental egg but did not eject it. This acceptance after pecking is not the consequence of a failure at puncture ejection, given that when confronted with real eggs (soft and easily punctured) in the second experiment, only 20% of pecked eggs were ejected, signifying that females that pecked at eggs without ejecting them had a low motivation to eject. We also discuss the effect of clutch inspection and the function of pecking strength. Finally, based on our own and previous research demonstrating pecking not followed by rejection, we propose a stepwise discrimination process in which accumulating motivation plays a key role in determining behavioural pathways shaping host response to parasitic eggs.