Premium
Sound or Silence: Call Recognition in the Temporal Domain by the Frog Allobates femoralis
Author(s) -
Vélez Alejandro,
Hödl Walter,
Amézquita Adolfo
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
ethology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.739
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1439-0310
pISSN - 0179-1613
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02021.x
Subject(s) - interval (graph theory) , signal (programming language) , agonistic behaviour , communication , animal communication , variation (astronomy) , call duration , range (aeronautics) , acoustics , speech recognition , psychology , pattern recognition (psychology) , computer science , mathematics , artificial intelligence , physics , aggression , social psychology , telecommunications , materials science , combinatorics , astrophysics , composite material , programming language
Acoustic communication often mediates agonistic interactions in territorial species. Because both the reaction to potential intruders and the lack thereof are costly, mechanisms that allow recognition of conspecific signals should be evident in intrasexual communication systems. While the spectral domain of the recognition space of the frog Allobates femoralis appears asymmetrically shaped in a way that reduces masking interference by the often syntopic frog Ameerega trivittata , frequency alone does not appear to account for the correct identification of conspecific intruders (Amézquita et al., Animal Behaviour , 70, 2005: 1377). As signal recognition may rely on a combination of spectral and temporal parameters of the signal, we test here the subsequent prediction that the recognition space should be asymmetrical in the temporal domain as well. We conducted playback experiments with 80 synthetic calls on 30 males and modeled all‐or‐none responses to define unidimensional functions of the recognition space for two call parameters: note duration and internote interval. For both parameters, male maximal response matched very well the average values of the conspecific signal and decreased with concomitant deviations from these values. While the response curves exceeded the range of signal variation and were not asymmetrical for either call parameter, they differed in breadth. The highest male permissiveness to variation in internote interval, as evidenced by a broader response curve, coincided with the lower probability of between‐species overlap in this signal parameter. Together with previous studies, our data suggest that a combination of spectral and temporal parameters of the advertisement call is necessary for recognition of calling intruders in A. femoralis . Our results emphasize the importance of multidimensional approaches in understanding signal recognition mechanisms in acoustically complex environments.