Independence of Sexual and Anti‐Predator Perceptual Functions in an Acoustic Moth: Implications for the Receiver Bias Mechanism in Signal Evolution

The receiver bias model for the evolution of mating signals proposes that selection favors male displays that happen to stimulate a general, ancestral perception in females such that receptivity and successful courtship increase. If these male signals do arise, however, the female perception will operate in two contexts, the original, typically non‐sexual, one and courtship. We may then ask whether these two functions represent the same or distinct traits, which may be under separate neural and genetic control. We studied this question in Achroia grisella , a pyralid moth species in which males attract females, with an ultrasonic mating song. Hearing in pyralid moths is widespread and originated in an anti‐predator context – the perception and avoidance of echolocating bats – and it is inferred that the male song found in A. grisella , and in several other pyralid species, arose subsequently via a receiver bias mechanism: Females perceiving male‐produced ultrasound and responding with anti‐predator behavior normally exhibited in the presence of bat echolocations may have inadvertently increased the likelihood of successful courtship. We measured hearing responses in both sexual and anti‐predator contexts in inbred lines developed from an A. grisella population. Significant inter‐line variance was observed for sensitivity thresholds for female response to male song and for both female and male responses to synthetic bat echolocation signals. Female responses to male song and to synthetic echolocations differed markedly in sensitivity, and the median sexual and anti‐predator responses in the various lines were not correlated. However, a higher level of similarity occurs between the female and male anti‐predator responses. Thus, genetic variance for sexual and anti‐predator responses appears to exist, and the two responses may represent independent traits. These results imply that when male signals originate via a receiver bias mechanism, female perception does not necessarily remain fixed in its ancestral state but has the potential for continued modification.