Premium
Power to Hold Sheltering Burrows by Juveniles of the Signal Crayfish, Pasifastacus leniusculus
Author(s) -
Ranta Esa,
Lindström Kai
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
ethology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.739
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1439-0310
pISSN - 0179-1613
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00961.x
Subject(s) - crayfish , burrow , carapace , biology , fishery , ecology , zoology , crustacean
Juveniles of the signal crayfish reside during daylight hours in shelters. At twilight they leave for food, at daybreak they either return or find another shelter. We examined conflicts over burrow ownership. At low densities with equal numbers of shelters and crayfish 1/5 of the burrows were occupied. Increasing both the number of crayfish and shelters improved the occupancy close to 50%. Doubling the number of crayfish in relation to the number of shelters increased the occupancy up to 75%. In an experiment with 30 randomly selected crayfish and 15 sheltering holes available the burrow holders were about 1–2 mm longer in carapace length than those found freely moving in the aquarium. Shelter owners were rarely newly moulted individuals. Size asymmetry (2 mm difference in carapace length) between owner and intruder affected the outcome of the contest over burrow ownership. When intruders were larger than owners, takeovers occurred in about 80% of the cases tested. If the owner was large and the intruder small the takeover frequency was about 20%. When the owner and the intruder were of matching size takeovers were still observed in about 45% of the cases. The outcome of the ownership contest has a true meaning. In a nursery‐pond experiment, where low‐protein food was randomly scattered all around, no size differences were found in carapace lengths of crayfish juveniles residing in different shelters. However, when high‐protein food was introduced in a single spot, owners of burrows were significantly larger and more numerous in the nearby shelters than in the shelters furthest away from the food source. Therefore, when food is unevenly distributed the burrow ownership contests may potentially lead to size asymmetries between individuals. This may lead to large individuals nearby the food growing faster than small individuals further away from the food source, a process likely to further enhance size differences.