Premium
Influence of Unrewarded Stimuli on the Classification of Visual Patterns by Honey Bees
Author(s) -
Ronacher Bernhard
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
ethology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.739
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1439-0310
pISSN - 0179-1613
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00960.x
Subject(s) - contrast (vision) , salience (neuroscience) , communication , preference , artificial intelligence , psychology , biology , pattern recognition (psychology) , cognitive psychology , mathematics , computer science , statistics
Bees were trained to discriminate visual patterns in five experiments. The rewarded pattern (S+), was a 50‐mm black disc in all experiments; the unrewarded pattern (S–) was varied. Subsequently bees were given a choice between different stimuli in order to discover what bees learnt about five attributes of the training stimuli. The attributes tested were size, contrast, color, ‘compactness’ vs. ‘dissectedness’ (tests with ring‐patterns), and presence or absence of acute points (tests with discs, squares, triangles and stars). The significance of these attributes varied with the particular unrewarded pattern (S–) used in training (Figs. 1, 2). This is interpreted as a modification of the bee's selective attention to certain features during training. The results also indicate a difference in the salience of attributes. Differences in size or outline (presence of acute points) only influenced the bee's preference after a training that specifically required this distinction, while differences in contrast, colour and dissectedness were also significant when the training stimuli did not differ in that respect.