Premium
Cryopreservation of human sperm: efficacy and use of a new nitrogen‐free controlled rate freezer versus liquid nitrogen vapour freezing
Author(s) -
Creemers E.,
Nijs M.,
Vanheusden E.,
Ombelet W.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
andrologia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.633
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1439-0272
pISSN - 0303-4569
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01070.x
Subject(s) - liquid nitrogen , cryopreservation , semen , sperm , sperm motility , nitrogen , andrology , semen cryopreservation , chemistry , biology , medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , embryo , organic chemistry
Summary Preservation of spermatozoa is an important aspect of assisted reproductive medicine. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and use of a recently developed liquid nitrogen and cryogen‐free controlled rate freezer and this compared with the classical liquid nitrogen vapour freezing method for the cryopreservation of human spermatozoa. Ten patients entering the IVF programme donated semen samples for the study. Samples were analysed according to the World Health Organization guidelines. No significant difference in total sperm motility after freeze–thawing between the new technique and classical technique was demonstrated. The advantage of the new freezing technique is that it uses no liquid nitrogen during the freezing process, hence being safer to use and clean room compatible. Investment costs are higher for the apparatus but running costs are only 1% in comparison with classical liquid nitrogen freezing. In conclusion, post‐thaw motility of samples frozen with the classical liquid nitrogen vapour technique was comparable with samples frozen with the new nitrogen‐free freezing technique. This latter technique can thus be a very useful asset to the sperm cryopreservation laboratory.