Premium
Investigation of Senescence in Canine Fibroblasts
Author(s) -
Streit S.,
Salomon F. V.,
Stahl T.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
anatomia, histologia, embryologia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.34
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 1439-0264
pISSN - 0340-2096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2005.00669_115.x
Subject(s) - doubling time , senescence , biology , population , cellular senescence , fibroblast , life expectancy , ageing , andrology , life span , cell , cell culture , phenotype , physiology , pathology , genetics , medicine , evolutionary biology , environmental health , gene
and Aims: Primary and secondary cell cultures of canine dermal fibroblasts were used to test the suitability of several senescence‐linked cellular markers to characterize the chronological age of dogs. In further studies these markers will be used to test the hypothesis that senescence‐linked changes at the cellular level are representative for the observed inverse relationship of body mass and life expectancy in different dog breeds. Methods: In this study standardized skin samples of Beagles were used to analyse the cell morphology and several senescence‐linked parameters as Cumulative Population Doubling Level, Highest Population Doubling Level, Culture Doubling Time and Life Span Completed to determine the replicative potential of fibroblasts. The samples were divided by the age of the donors into three groups (‘young’, ‘middle’ and ‘old’). Results: There are notable differences between the replicative potential of young and old Beagles at the cellular level. Preliminary results show that in fibroblast cultures obtained from the young group the highest population doubling level is higher and the culture doubling time is shorter then in cultures of the old group. Cultures from the young and middle‐aged group cannot be distinguished by the measured parameters. For final results the complete statistical analysis of sampled data has to be carried out. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a relationship between the chronological age of the skin donor and the replicative potential of the dermal fibroblasts. Therefore cellular senescence‐linked markers could serve as suitable tools to compare the age of individual dogs of different breeds.