Premium
Persistently low fruiting success in the Mediterranean pipevine Aristolochia baetica (Aristolochiaceae): a multi‐year study
Author(s) -
Berjano R.,
Arista M.,
Ortiz P. L.,
Talavera S.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
plant biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.871
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1438-8677
pISSN - 1435-8603
DOI - 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00396.x
Subject(s) - biology , aristolochiaceae , pollination , predation , reproductive success , botany , pollen , open pollination , fructification , horticulture , ecology , population , demography , sociology
Low fruit set is common in many plant species and may be caused by a variety of factors, such as predation, resource limitation or deficient pollination, or it may be an evolutionary strategy. In this paper, we investigate factors that affect fruit set in Aristolochia baetica (Aristolochiaceae), a Mediterranean pipevine found in southwest Spain. Fruit production was monitored in two populations over 4 years (2002–2005), and the causes of flower or fruit loss were determined. Experimental hand‐pollinations were performed, and germinated pollen grains on the stigmas of open‐pollinated flowers were quantified. Fruit set was always very low (4–14%). Floral abscission initially reduced reproductive output by more than 50%; then herbivory (6–12%) and fruit abortion (8–26%) caused further reductions. Given that the number of efficiently pollinated flowers was always higher than that of ripe fruits, and that xenogamous hand‐pollination did not increase fruit set in relation to open‐pollination, the final fruit production of A. baetica seems not to be pollen‐limited. Fruit abortion of effectively pollinated flowers supports the idea that resource availability limits fruit set. In A. baetica , fruit abortion could lead to mate selection of the best quality fruits. Moreover, the initiated fruits that finally abort could also satiate predators, contributing to increase progeny fitness.