z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Significance of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of anti‐HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation
Author(s) -
Ishida Hideki,
Hirai Toshihito,
Kohei Naoki,
Yamaguchi Yutaka,
Tanabe Kazunari
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
transplant international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.998
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1432-2277
pISSN - 0934-0874
DOI - 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01166.x
Subject(s) - medicine , human leukocyte antigen , transplantation , kidney transplantation , antibody , immunology , donor specific antibodies , clinical significance , histocompatibility testing , antigen
Summary In this study, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between the presence/titers of donor‐specific (DSA)/nondonor‐specific antibody (NDSA) and the rate of graft rejection after transplantation. The subjects comprised 34 recipients who tested positive by FlowPRA ® Screening. The recipients were divided into two groups; 22 recipients with DSA and 12 recipients with NDSA, as detected using FlowPRA ® Single Antigen I and II beads. The antibodies were also quantitatively examined using the molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF) method. Nine of the 22 recipients with DSA (9/22, 40%) developed antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), while none of the 12 recipients with NDSA (0/12, 0%) developed AMR ( P  < 0.01). In a quantitative analysis of the MESF data, patients with DSA with MESF values of over 3000 frequently showed AMR (8/11, 73%). In contrast, one of the patients with DSA with MESF values of <3000 showed AMR (1/11, 9%). One of the 12 patients (1/12, 8%) with NDSA showed cellular rejection (T‐cell‐mediated rejection), regardless of the MESF values. In patients with DSA, an MESF value of 3000 may be a useful cutoff value for identifying patients at a high risk for AMR.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here