Induction of CYP1A1 Gene by Benzimidazole Derivatives During Caco‐2 Cell Differentiation

The Caco‐2 cell line, derived from a human colon adenocarcinoma, is unique in its property of spontaneously differentiating into a mature enterocyte cell type during its growth in culture. In this work, we compared the response of the CYP1A1 gene with the benzimidazole derivatives omeprazole and lansoprazole, and with the classical inducer β‐naphthoflavone in the Caco‐2 cells at various culture stages. In addition, we characterized the Caco‐2 aryl‐hydrocarbon receptor. The protein‐synthesis inhibitor cyclo‐heximide led to a derepression of the CYP1A1 gene transcription, and to a superinduction when combined with either β‐naphthoflavone or benzimidazoles. Taking advantage of the spontaneous differentiation of Caco‐2 cells in long‐term cultures, we observed a difference in behavior between the classical inducer β‐naphthoflavone and the atypical inducer omeprazole. In the poorly differentiated cells, both compounds elicited comparable dose/response and rate of induction of CYP1A1 gene expression. In the fully differentiated cells, in contrast, the induction by omeprazole was only transient, whereas the response to β‐naphthoflavone was long lasting. The Caco‐2 aryl‐hydrocarbon receptor exhibited binding characteristics similar to those determined for human liver and other tissues. The induction of CYP1A1 transcription by benzimidazole derivatives in Caco‐2 cells occurred with no direct binding of benzimidazole derivatives to the aryl‐hydrocarbon receptor, as in human hepatocytes. However, transient transfection experiments clearly showed that the xenobiotic‐responsive element enhancer, with which the activated aryl‐hydrocarbon receptor interacts, could drive the induction of a heterologous promoter in the presence of benzimidazoles. Finally the presence of the activated aryl‐hydrocarbon receptor in the nuclei of the Caco‐2 cells exposed to these molecules was clearly demonstrated by gel‐retardation experiments. These results question about the mechanism of ligand‐independent activation of the aryl‐hydrocarbon receptor and intracellular signaling, initiated by benzimidazole derivatives.