z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Lysyl‐tRNA synthetase from yeast
Author(s) -
FREIST Wolfgang,
STERNBACH Hans,
CRAMER Friedrich
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
european journal of biochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1432-1033
pISSN - 0014-2956
DOI - 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16723.x
Subject(s) - valine , aminoacylation , isoleucine , lysine , amino acid , aminoacyl trna synthetase , enzyme , genetic code , biology , transfer rna , stereochemistry , biochemistry , nucleotide , phosphorylation , methionine , enzyme kinetics , leucine , chemistry , active site , rna , gene
Discrimination factors ( D ) which are characteristic for discrimination between lysine and 19 naturally occuring non‐cognate amino acids have been determined from k cat and K m values for native and phosphorylated lysyl‐tRNA synthetases from yeast. Generally, both species of this class II aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetase are considerably less specific than the class I synthetases specific for isoleucine, valine, tyrosine, and arginine. D values of the native enzyme are in the range 90–1700, D values of the phosphorylated species in the range 40–770. The phosphorylated enzyme acts faster and less accurately. In aminoacylation of tRNA Lys ‐C‐C‐A(2′NH 2 ) discrimination factors D 1 vary over 30–980 for the native and over 8–300 for the phosphorylated enzyme. From AMP formation stoichiometry and D 1 values pretransfer proof‐reading factors ( II 1 ) of 1.1–56 were calculated for the native enzyme, factors of 1.0–44 for the phosphorylated species. Post‐transfer proof‐reading factors ( II 2 ) were calculated from D values and AMP formation stoichiometry in acylation of tRNA Lys ‐C‐C‐A. Pretransfer proof‐reading is the main correction step, posttransfer proof‐reading is less effective or negligible ( II 2 ∼ 1–8). Initial discrimination factors ( I ), which are due to differences in Gibbs free energies of binding between lysine and noncognate substrates (ΔΔ G I ), were calculated from discrimination and proof‐reading factors. In contrast to class I synthetases, for lysyl‐tRNA synthetase only one initial discrimination step can be assumed and amino acid recognition is reduced to a three‐step process instead of the four‐step recognition observed for the class I synthetases. Plots of ΔΔ G I values against accessible surface areas of amino acids show clearly that phosphorylation of the enzyme changes the structures of the amino acid binding sites. This is illustrated by a hypothetical ‘stopper model’ of these sites.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here