
Multisite contacts involved in coupling of the β‐adrenergic receptor with the stimulatory guanine‐nucleotide‐binding regulatory protein
Author(s) -
MÜNCH Gerald,
DEES Christian,
HEKMAN Mirko,
PALM Dieter
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
european journal of biochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1432-1033
pISSN - 0014-2956
DOI - 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16023.x
Subject(s) - g protein , transducin , receptor , guanine nucleotide exchange factor , effector , g protein coupled receptor , biology , biochemistry , gtp binding protein regulators , adenylate kinase , biophysics , microbiology and biotechnology , gtp' , rhodopsin , g alpha subunit , nucleotide , binding site , protein subunit , cytoplasm , signal transduction , gene , retinal , enzyme
Synthetic peptides, 12–22 amino acid residues long, comprising the presumed coupling sites of the β‐adrenergic receptor with the stimulatory guanine‐nucleotide‐binding regulatory protein (G s ), were examined for their ability to modulate G s activation in turkey erythrocyte membranes. Three peptides corresponding to the second cytoplasmic loop, the N‐terminal region of the third cytoplasmic loop, and the N‐terminal region of the putative fourth cytoplasmic loop, compete synergistically with the hormone‐stimulated receptor for G s activation with median effector concentrations of 15–35 μM, or 3–4 μM for combinations of two peptides. One peptide, corresponding to the C‐terminal region of the third cytoplasmic loop, carries the unique ability to activate the G s ‐adenylate‐cyclase complex independent of the signalling state of the receptor. These observations are consistent with a dynamic model of receptor‐mediated G‐protein activation in membranes, where domains composed of the second, third and fourth intracellular loop of the receptor bind to and are interactive with the G‐protein heterotrimer, resulting in ligand‐induced conformational changes of the receptor. In response to hormone binding, the extent or the number of sites involved in interaction with G s may be readjusted using a fourth site. Modulation of coupling sites may elicit congruent conformational changes within the G s heterotrimer, with qualitatively different effects on GTP/GDP exchange in the α subunit of G s and downstream effector regulation. This model corroborates and expands a similar model suggested for activated rhodopsin‐transducin interaction [König, B., Arendt, A., McDowell, J. H., Kahlert, M., Hargrave, P. A. & Hofmann, K. P. (1989) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86 , 6878–6882.