Premium
The rights of blood recipients should supersede any asserted rights of blood donors
Author(s) -
Brooks J. P.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
vox sanguinis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.68
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1423-0410
pISSN - 0042-9007
DOI - 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2004.00567.x
Subject(s) - blood donor , dilemma , donation , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , blood donations , medicine , ethical dilemma , human rights , transmission (telecommunications) , human blood , immunology , law , political science , physiology , engineering , philosophy , electrical engineering , epistemology
Some gay men have argued that the laboratory testing of blood is so accurate that continued deferrals based upon sexual activity are unnecessary and unjust. They also assert that they have a right to donate blood. There has been much debate over altering the rule barring donation from men who have had sex with other men since 1977, with blood organizations disagreeing over the best course of action. Two studies have indicated that changing the rule would increase the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. This dilemma is part of a broader issue, namely: what are the responsibilities of blood services to blood donors and recipients? Blood services should base decisions regarding donor suitability on science rather than on their donors’ desires. Blood services must recognize that the rights of blood recipients should supersede any asserted rights of blood donors.