Premium
Determinants of distribution and prevalence of avian malaria in blue tit populations across Europe: separating host and parasite effects
Author(s) -
SZÖLLŐSI E.,
CICHOŃ M.,
EENS M.,
HASSELQUIST D.,
KEMPENAERS B.,
MERINO S.,
NILSSON J.Å.,
ROSIVALL B.,
RYTKÖNEN S.,
TÖRÖK J.,
WOOD M. J.,
GARAMSZEGI L. Z.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of evolutionary biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.289
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1420-9101
pISSN - 1010-061X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02339.x
Subject(s) - biology , host (biology) , phylogenetic tree , range (aeronautics) , avian malaria , parasite hosting , lineage (genetic) , zoology , local adaptation , ecology , adaptation (eye) , plasmodium (life cycle) , evolutionary biology , malaria , population , plasmodium falciparum , genetics , demography , materials science , immunology , neuroscience , sociology , world wide web , computer science , gametocyte , composite material , gene
Although avian malarial parasites are globally distributed, the factors that affect the geographical distribution and local prevalence of different parasite lineages across host populations or species are still poorly understood. Based on the intense screening of avian malarial parasites in nine European blue tit populations, we studied whether distribution ranges as well as local adaptation, host specialization and phylogenetic relationships can determine the observed prevalences within populations. We found that prevalence differed consistently between parasite lineages and host populations, indicating that the transmission success of parasites is lineage specific but is partly shaped by locality‐specific effects. We also found that the lineage‐specific estimate of prevalence was related to the distribution range of parasites: lineages found in more host populations were generally more prevalent within these populations. Additionally, parasites with high prevalence that were also widely distributed among blue tit populations were also found to infect more host species. These findings suggest that parasites reaching high local prevalence can also realize wide distribution at a global scale that can have further consequences for host specialization. Although phylogenetic relationships among parasites did not predict prevalence, we detected a close match between a tree based on the geographic distance of the host populations and the parasite phylogenetic tree, implying that neighbouring host populations shared a related parasite fauna.