Premium
The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis
Author(s) -
FRECKLETON R. P.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of evolutionary biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.289
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1420-9101
pISSN - 1010-061X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01757.x
Subject(s) - biology , scope (computer science) , comparative biology , phylogenetic comparative methods , comparative method , data science , evolutionary biology , phylogenetic tree , management science , computer science , genetics , linguistics , philosophy , gene , economics , programming language
Phylogenetic comparative methods are extremely commonly used in evolutionary biology. In this paper, I highlight some of the problems that are frequently encountered in comparative analyses and review how they can be fixed. In broad terms, the problems boil down to a lack of appreciation of the underlying assumptions of comparative methods, as well as problems with implementing methods in a manner akin to more familiar statistical approaches. I highlight that the advent of more flexible computing environments should improve matters and allow researchers greater scope to explore methods and data.