z-logo
Premium
‘Anti‐bee’ and ‘pro‐bird’ changes during the evolution of hummingbird pollination in Penstemon flowers
Author(s) -
Castellanos M. C.,
Wilson P.,
Thomson J. D.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of evolutionary biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.289
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1420-9101
pISSN - 1010-061X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00729.x
Subject(s) - hummingbird , biology , pollinator , pollination , nectar , pollen , botany , trait , computer science , programming language
Floral phenotypes may be as much the result of selection for avoidance of some animal visitors as selection for improving the interaction with better pollinators. When specializing on hummingbird‐pollination, Penstemon flowers may have evolved to improve the morphological fit between bird and flower, or to exclude less‐efficient bees, or both. We hypothesized how such selection might work on four floral characters that affect the mechanics of pollen transfer: anther/stigma exsertion, presence of a lower corolla lip, width of the corolla tube, and angle of flower inclination. We surgically modified bee‐pollinated P. strictus flowers changing one trait at a time to make them resemble hummingbird‐pollinated P. barbatus flowers, and measured pollen transfer by bumblebees and hummingbirds. Results suggest that, apart from ‘pro‐bird’ adaptations, specific ‘anti‐bee’ adaptations have been important in shaping hummingbird‐flowers. Moreover, some trait changes may have been selected for only if changing in concert with other traits.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here