Premium
Residents and ICU nurses get reliable static and dynamic haemodynamic assessments with aortic oesophageal D oppler
Author(s) -
ROBERT J. M.,
FLOCCARD B.,
CROZON J.,
BOYLE E. M.,
LEVRAT A.,
GUILLAUME C.,
BENATIR F.,
FAURE A.,
MARCOTTE G.,
HAUTIN E.,
ALLAOUCHICHE B.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02610.x
Subject(s) - medicine , hemodynamics , stroke volume , observational study , cardiac output , anesthesia , cardiology , heart rate , blood pressure
Background Aortic oesophageal D oppler ( ODM ) allows continuous non‐invasive haemodynamic monitoring. We tested to confirm if residents and nurses were able to reposition oesophageal probe ( OP ), obtain aortic blood flow of good quality and so perform reliable static and dynamic haemodynamic assessments. Methods Prospective observational study assessing ODM measurements were obtained by six residents and three nurses after they have participated in training. Measured (aortic diameter) and calculated haemodynamic data [indexed stroke volume ( SVI ), cardiac index] were directly obtained from ODM , after residents and nurses repositioned the OP . In a second group of patients, we tested the ability of residents and nurses to detect rapid haemodynamic changes after a passive leg raising. SVI comparison was the primary end point. Statistical analysis was performed using the method of B land and A ltman. Results Sixty‐six haemodynamic measurements were performed on 42 patients. Mean bias for SVI between the skilled physician and residents, and between the skilled physician and nurses were −0.9 ± 5.2 ml/m 2 ( P = 0.15), with a percentage error of 31%, and 0.9 ± 5.1 ml/m 2 ( P = 0.14), with a percentage error of 33%, respectively. There was an excellent correlation for SVI between the physician and residents ( r = 0.9; P < 0.0001) and between the physician and nurses ( r = 0.9; P < 0.0001). Induced changes in SVI measured by residents and nurses strongly followed those of our skilled physician. Conclusion Residents and nurses get reliable static and dynamic haemodynamic assessments with ODM compared to our skilled physician.