Quality of pharmacokinetic studies in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy

Continuous renal replacement therapy ( CRRT ) is the preferred renal replacement therapy modality in the critically ill. We aimed to reveal the literature on the pharmacokinetic studies in critically ill patients receiving CRRT with special reference to quality assessment of these studies and the CRRT dose. We conducted a systematic review by searching the MEDLINE , EMBASE , and the C ochrane databases to D ecember 2009 and bibliographies of relevant review articles. We included original studies reporting from critically ill adult subjects receiving CRRT because of acute kidney injury with a special emphasis on drug pharmacokinetics. We used the minimum reporting criteria for CRRT studies by A cute D ialysis Q uality I nitiative ( ADQI ) and, second, the D owns and B lack checklist to assess the quality of the studies. We calculated the CRRT dose per study. We included pharmacokinetic parameters, residual renal function, and recommendations on drug dosing. Of 182 publications, 95 were considered relevant and 49 met the inclusion criteria. The median [interquartile range ( IQR )] number of reported criteria by ADQI was 7.0 (5.0–8.0) of 12. The median ( IQR ) D owns and B lack quality score was 15 (14–16) of 32. None of the publications reported CRRT dose directly. The median ( IQR ) weighted CRRT dose was 23.7 (18.8–27.9) ml/kg/h. More attention should be paid both to standardizing the CRRT dose and reporting of the CRRT parameters in pharmacokinetic studies. The general quality of the studies during CRRT in the critically ill was only moderate and would be greatly improved by reports in concordant with the ADQI recommendations.