Premium
The effects on the lower esophageal sphincter of sevoflurane induction and increased intra‐abdominal pressure during laparoscopy
Author(s) -
Thörn K.,
Thörn S.E.,
Wattwil M.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01069.x
Subject(s) - medicine , sevoflurane , insufflation , cricoid pressure , anesthesia , laparoscopy , inhalation , abdomen , pneumoperitoneum , peak inspiratory pressure , surgery , tidal volume , intubation , respiratory system
Background: Today sevoflurane is one of the most frequently used volatile anesthetics. The speed of induction can approach that of intravenous anesthetics, and case reports using sevoflurane induction for emergency anesthesia have been published. The purpose of this study in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients was to investigate the effects of sevoflurane during inhalation induction on the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and barrier pressure (BrP). The effects on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and BrP of increased intra‐abdominal pressure during laparoscopy were also evaluated. Methods: We recorded LESP and BrP in nine patients using a Dent sleeve device. Recordings were made before and after inhalation induction of anesthesia with 8% sevoflurane, as well as before and after insufflation of CO 2 into the abdomen. Results: After induction with sevoflurane, LESP ( P = 0.039) and BrP ( P = 0.020) decreased. Nevertheless, BrP was kept positive in all patients. Insufflation of CO 2 into the abdomen during laparoscopy induced a significant increase in LESP ( P = 0.02) and gastric pressure ( P = 0.004). However, there was no significant change in BrP ( P = 0.66); it increased in four patients and decreased in five. Conclusion: BrP was kept positive in all patients after induction of anesthesia. Therefore, we believe that in combination with cricoid pressure, inhalation induction with sevoflurane might be a safe choice. As the adaptive increase in LESP during laparoscopy was not enough to retain a barrier pressure in all patients, it is important to be aware of the risk of regurgitation throughout the anesthesia.