z-logo
Premium
Relationship between arterial and end‐tidal carbon dioxide pressures during anesthesia using a laryngeal tube
Author(s) -
Lee J. S.,
Nam S. B.,
Chang C. H.,
Han D. W.,
Lee Y. W.,
Shin C. S.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00698.x
Subject(s) - anesthesia , medicine , ventilation (architecture) , endotracheal tube , mechanical ventilation , intubation , carbon dioxide , chemistry , physics , organic chemistry , thermodynamics
Background:  The Laryngeal Tube ® (LT), (VBM Medizintechnik, Sulz, Germany) is a relatively new supraglottic device for controlling the airway. Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO 2 ) can be estimated by monitoring the end‐tidal tension of carbon dioxide (PETCO 2 ). The relationship between PETCO 2 and PaCO 2 during controlled ventilation via the LT has not been reported. Methods:  During general anesthesia, 45 patients were mechanically ventilated using an LT. PETCO 2 and PaCO 2 were measured once PETCO 2 had reached a steady state. The LT was then removed and the trachea intubated using an endotracheal tube (ETT), and the identical ventilatory variables were resumed. Following stabilization, PETCO 2 was again determined and PaCO 2 estimated. Results:  The mean PETCO 2 and PaCO 2 values were 4.43 ± 0.26 kPa and 4.67 ± 0.32 kPa, respectively, during LT ventilation, and 4.36 ± 0.23 kPa and 4.61 ± 0.26 kPa, respectively, during ETT ventilation. Analysis of differences between the PETCO 2 and PaCO 2 values using the Bland and Altman method revealed a bias ± precision of 0.24 ± 0.15 kPa for LT and 0.27 ± 0.15 kPa for ETT. The root mean square error was 0.28 for the LT and 0.30 for the ETT. Conclusion:  This study suggests that for healthy adult patients mechanically ventilated via the LT, the PETCO 2 value reflects the PaCO 2 value as closely as when patients are ETT ventilated, allowing capnometry to be used to evaluate the adequacy of ventilation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here