Premium
High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with traumatic brain injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
Author(s) -
David M.,
Karmrodt J.,
Weiler N.,
Scholz A.,
Markstaller K.,
Eberle B.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00570.x
Subject(s) - medicine , mean airway pressure , ards , cerebral perfusion pressure , intracranial pressure , high frequency ventilation , anesthesia , respiratory distress , mechanical ventilation , ventilation (architecture) , airway , traumatic brain injury , lung , cerebral blood flow , psychiatry , engineering , mechanical engineering
Background: This study observed adverse events of rescue treatment with high‐frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in head‐injured patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: Data of five male patients with ARDS and traumatic brain injury, median age 28 years, who failed to respond to conventional pressure‐controlled ventilation (PCV) were analyzed retrospectively during HFOV. Adjusted mean airway pressure at initiation of HFOV was set to 5 cm H 2 O above the last measured mean airway pressure during PCV. Frequency of pulmonary air leak, mucus obstruction, tracheal injury, and need of HFOV termination due to increased intracranial pressure, decreased cerebral perfusion pressure, or deterioration in P a CO 2 were analyzed. Results: During HFOV we found no complications. We recorded 390 datasets of intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure and P a CO 2 simultaneously. Intracranial pressure increased (>25 mmHg) in 11 of 390 datasets, cerebral perfusion pressure was reduced (<70 mmHg) in 66 of 390 datasets, and P a CO 2 variations (<4.7 kPa; >6.0 kPa) were observed in eight of 390 datasets after initiation of HFOV. All these alterations were responsive to treatment. P a O 2 / F I O 2 ‐ratio improved in four patients during HFOV. Conclusion: High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation appears to be a promising alternative rescue treatment in head‐injured patients with ARDS if continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure and P a CO 2 are provided, in particular during initiation of HFOV.