Premium
Intubating conditions provided by propofol and alfentanil ‐ acceptable, but not ideal
Author(s) -
HARSTEN A.,
GILLBERG L.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04824.x
Subject(s) - alfentanil , medicine , propofol , anesthesia , intubation , heart rate , hemodynamics , blood pressure
Background: The use of muscle relaxants to facilitate intubation is associated with several side effects regardless of whether depolarizing or non‐depolarizing drugs are used. In the present study we compared the intubating conditions, haemodynamic responses and changes in oxygen saturation following induction with alfentanil and propofol or alfentanil, thiopental and suxamethonium. Methods: Eighty patients (ASA I or II) were in a double‐blind manner assigned to receive either of the two induction methods. Intubating conditions were assessed on the basis of jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the endotracheal tube and coughing on intubation. Heart rate, systolic arterial pressure and oxygen saturation were monitored throughout the procedure. Results: The use of alfentanil and propofol resulted in significantly lower scored intubation points. Systolic arterial pressure decreased and heart rate increased significantly in the alfentanil‐thiopental‐suxamethonium group as compared to the alfentanil‐propofol group. There were no significant changes in oxygen saturation. Conclusion: The results show that propofol and alfentanil in combination provides haemodynamic stability and unaltered oxygen saturation but less optimal intubating conditions.