Premium
Quality of life in patients with bipolar I depression: data from 920 patients
Author(s) -
Yatham Lakshmi N,
Lecrubier Yves,
Fieve Ronald R,
Davis Kimberly H,
Harris Soyna D,
Krishnan Anupama A
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
bipolar disorders
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.285
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1399-5618
pISSN - 1398-5647
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00134.x
Subject(s) - depression (economics) , bipolar disorder , quality of life (healthcare) , psychology , randomized controlled trial , psychiatry , clinical psychology , medicine , mood , psychotherapist , economics , macroeconomics
Objective: To determine the impact of acute depression on quality of life (QOL) in patients with bipolar I disorder and to compare these results with published data on QOL in patients with unipolar depression. Methods: Quality of life was assessed using the SF‐36 in bipolar patients (n = 958) who had recently experienced an episode of acute bipolar depression and participated in a large randomized, double‐blind, safety and efficacy trial. Seven studies that included SF‐36 data from patients with unipolar depression were identified in the published literature and descriptive comparisons of SF‐36 scores were made between the unipolar depression trials and this bipolar depression trial. Results: There were 920 patients who completed the SF‐36. Mean transformed scores, which could range from 0 to 100, were very low in bipolar depressed patients for the role‐physical (36.7), vitality (22.4), social functioning (29.9), role‐emotion (11.4), and mental health (31.0) subscales. Mean SF‐36 scores for all subscales were significantly and inversely correlated (p < 0.0001) with the HAM‐D indicating that patients with milder depressive symptoms had better QOL. Further, the mean SF‐36 scores for the bipolar sample were consistently lower compared with published data on QOL in unipolar depression on four of the eight subscales: general health; social functioning; role‐physical, and role‐emotional. Conclusions: While both unipolar and bipolar depression have serious detrimental effects on patient QOL, our results suggest that some aspects of QOL may be worse in bipolar depression.