Premium
Effect of αGal on corneal xenotransplantation in a mouse model
Author(s) -
Choi Hyuk Jin,
Kim Mee Kum,
Lee Hyun Ju,
Jeong So Hee,
Kang Hee Jung,
Park ChanSik,
Park ChungGyu,
Joon Kim Sang,
Wee Won Ryang
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
xenotransplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.052
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1399-3089
pISSN - 0908-665X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2011.00641.x
Subject(s) - xenotransplantation , immune privilege , corneal transplantation , transplantation , medicine , andrology , decellularization , cornea , immunology , ophthalmology , immune system , tissue engineering , biomedical engineering
Choi HJ, Kim MK, Lee HJ, Jeong SH, Kang HJ, Park C‐S, Park C‐G, Kim SJ, Wee WR. Effect of αGal on corneal xenotransplantation in a mouse model. Xenotransplantation 2011; 18: 176–182. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: It has been reported that hyperacute rejection (HAR) does not occur after pig‐to‐nonhuman corneal xenotransplantation. However, considering that immune privilege is already disrupted in most human corneal recipients, and the expression of αGal can be gradually reduced after pig‐to‐rat corneal transplantation, the long‐term survival of corneal grafts from wild‐type pigs cannot be guaranteed. Accordingly, we aimed to investigate the effect of αGal on the change in anti‐Gal antibodies, using sensitized α1,3‐galactosyltransferase gene‐knockout (GTKO) mice recipients. Methods: C57BL/6 (B6) and GTKO mice were divided into 5 groups and underwent orthotopically full thickness cormeal transplantation as follows (n=4 for each group): (1) group 1: B6 to B6; (2) group 2: fresh porcine posterior corneal lamella to B6; (3) fresh porcine posterior corneal lamella to GTKO; (4) group 4: decellularized porcine posterior corneal lamella to GTKO, and (5) group 5: B6 to GTKO. Before transplantation, all GTKO recipients were sensitized using intraperitoneal injections of rabbit blood cells. Median survival times (MST) for the corneal grafts of the different groups were compared and plasma concentrations of IgG/IgM anti‐Gal antibodies were evaluated at 1 week, 2 weeks and 3 weeks post‐transplantation. Results: There were no differences in MSTs between groups. Although there was no HAR of fresh porcine posterior corneal grafts even in sensitized GTKO recipients, αGal expression was induced in the transplanted fresh porcine corneal grafts and plasma concentration of IgG anti‐Gal antibody was gradually increased in fresh porcine cornea‐grafted GTKO recipients. On the contrary, αGal expression did not increase in the grafts and plasma concentration of anti‐Gal antibodies did not change after transplantation using decellularized porcine corneas. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that αGal may affect the long‐term survival of porcine corneal xenografts via antibody‐mediated rejection, although αGal does not have an effect on acute rejection and decellularized porcine corneas may enable the long‐term survival of porcine corneal xenografts.