z-logo
Premium
Analysis of differences in photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency between four contrasting species
Author(s) -
Pons Thijs L.,
Westbeek Milka H. M.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
physiologia plantarum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.351
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1399-3054
pISSN - 0031-9317
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00380.x
Subject(s) - biology , botany , photosynthesis , nutrient , chlorophyll , nitrogen , horticulture , chemistry , ecology , organic chemistry
Causes of differences in photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency (PNUE), the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf N, were investigated in four species. These were in order of decreasing PNUE; the two herbs Galinsoga ciliata and Origanum vulgare , and the two trees Populus nigra and Quercus robur . Plants were grown in pots outdoors at three levels of nutrient availability. The light‐ and CO 2 response of gas exchange of leaves were measured, and their nitrogen and chlorophyll contents were determined. Furthermore, the internal conductance for CO 2 diffusion was estimated. Nutrients did not have a large effect on PNUE except in Galinsoga . Leaf mass per unit area was negatively correlated with PNUE max , which is likely to be partly caused by N present in cell wall proteins among other non‐photosynthetic N compounds. The trees had a larger fraction of photosynthetic N in light harvesting components compared to the herbs. This contributed also substantially to the difference in PNUE at light saturation (PNUE max ) between the two groups, but not for PNUE calculated for an overcast day. Intercellular CO 2 concentration was high in Galinsoga and Populus , which contributed significantly to their higher PNUE max , particularly at low nutrient availability. The large gradient in CO 2 concentration between intercellular spaces and chloroplasts was another factor that explained a substantial part of the differences in PNUE max between Quercus and the other species that had smaller gradients. Stomatal and internal conductances for CO 2 explained most of the difference in PNUE max between Quercus and Populus at high nutrient availability for which these data were available.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here