z-logo
Premium
Differential interaction of branch‐specific inhibitors of isoprenoid biosynthesis with cell cycle progression in tobacco BY‐2 cells
Author(s) -
Andréa Hemmerlin,
Fischt Isabelle,
Bach Thomas J.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
physiologia plantarum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.351
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1399-3054
pISSN - 0031-9317
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2000.1100308.x
Subject(s) - dolichol , tunicamycin , mevalonic acid , biochemistry , cell cycle , biology , nicotiana tabacum , catharanthus roseus , reductase , cell cycle checkpoint , biosynthesis , microbiology and biotechnology , cell , enzyme , apoptosis , unfolded protein response , gene
3‐Hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl‐coenzyme A (HMG‐CoA) reductase (HMGR), which catalyzes the formation of mevalonic acid (MVA), can be specifically blocked by mevinolin. Inhibition of HMGR in vivo leads to an arrest in cell cycle progression in tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L. Bright Yellow 2) cells. As MVA in plants is the common precursor of a myriad of isoprenoid products synthesized in the cytosol and mitochondria, it is difficult to identify among such MVA‐dependent molecules those whose lack may lead to cell cycle arrest. In an attempt to do so, branch‐specific inhibitors of the cytosolic isoprenoid pathway downstream from MVA were used to study their capacity to block cell cycle progression. The effects of squalestatin (sterol biosynthesis inhibitor), chaetomellic acid A and patulin (protein prenyltransferase (PT) inhibitors) and tunicamycin (inhibitor of dolichol‐dependent protein glycosyl transferase, thus mimicking the effect of an absence of dolichol) were compared to those induced by mevinolin. In this way, squalestatin and chaetomellic acid were identified as behaving like true cell cycle inhibitors, in that they led to a specific arrest in the cell cycle. However, they did not exactly mimic the mevinolin‐induced effects. Patulin proved to be of high general toxicity, which suggests that it may affect other reactions besides blockage of protein isoprenylation. Finally, tunicamycin efficiently blocked growth of cell suspension cultures, but did not arrest the cells in a specific phase of the cell cycle. Results are discussed in the context of a better understanding of the essential implication of isoprenoids in plant cell cycle progression.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here