Premium
Axillary bud flowering after apical decapitation in Pharbitis in relation to photoinduction
Author(s) -
Ono Michiyuki,
Ono Kimiyo Sage,
Yamada Koichiro,
Yasui Masaru,
Okazaki Mitsuo
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
physiologia plantarum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.351
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1399-3054
pISSN - 0031-9317
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb08782.x
Subject(s) - axillary bud , apical dominance , pharbitis nil , biology , lateral shoot , bud , shoot , kinetin , botany , apical cell , annual growth cycle of grapevines , horticulture , tissue culture , in vitro , biochemistry , genetics , cell
The flowering response of axillary buds of seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy, cv. Violet, was examined in relation to the timing of apical bud removal (plumule including the first leaf or second leaf) before or after a flower‐inductive 16‐h dark period. When the apical bud was removed well before the dark period, flower buds formed on the axillary shoots that subsequently developed, but when removed just before, or after, the dark period, different results were observed depending on the timing of the apical bud removal and plant age. In the case of 8‐day‐old seedlings, fewer flower buds formed on the axillary shoots developing from the cotyledonary node when plumules were removed 20 to 0 h before the dark period. When the apical bud was removed after the dark period, no flower buds formed. Using 14‐day‐old seedlings a similar reduction of flowering response was observed on the axillary shoots developing from the first leaf node when the apical bud was removed just after the dark period. To further elucidate the relationship between apical dominance and flowering, kinetin or IAA was applied to axillary buds or the cut site where the apical bud was located. Both chemicals influenced flowering, probably by modulating apical dominance which normally forces axillary buds to be dormant.