Premium
The apparent viscosity of the protoplasm of subepidermal stem basis cells of Pisum sativum. Relation to aging, drought tolerance and water stress
Author(s) -
LeeStadelmann Ok Young,
Hulme Dale A.,
Stadelmann Eduard J.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
physiologia plantarum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.351
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1399-3054
pISSN - 0031-9317
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1981.tb06036.x
Subject(s) - protoplasm , plasmolysis , pisum , sativum , turgor pressure , viscosity , botany , osmotic pressure , water content , biology , locule , horticulture , chemistry , biophysics , cell wall , cytoplasm , biochemistry , materials science , pollen , geotechnical engineering , engineering , composite material , stamen
Plants of Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska wilt resistant were subjected to two different water stress regimes under controlled environment conditions: watering was stopped either on the 7th day (early stress) or on the 21st day (late stress) after planting. Plants under the early stress regime developed drought tolerance (adapted), while those under late stress did not. The apparent viscosity of the protoplasm of subepidermal stem basis cells was analyzed by the centrifugation and plasmolysis form method during the entire growth period. The apparent viscosity of the subepidermal stem basis cells changed with plant age and was highest in 3‐week‐old plants. In controls the relation of apparent viscosity to age was the same when measured under full turgor and in relaxed state. Under early stress condition, however, the pattern of the viscosity changes with plant age was significantly different for turgescent and relaxed cells. In four week old plants, a higher apparent viscosity was measured in relaxed adapted cells than in relaxed control cells. It is suggested that the higher apparent viscosity is the result of a delayed cell aging. Apparent viscosity was inversely proportional to soil moisture content and the osmotic potential of the cell sap for the cells of late stress plants, whereas no clear relation was found for the cells of early stress plants. This difference may indicate two mechanisms of viscosity changes: 1) osmotic dehydration of the protoplasm under water stress (passive viscosity change), 2) changes in the amount, hydration or architecture of macromolecules present in the cytoplasm (active viscosity change). Whereas differences in the apparent viscosity between control and stressed cells may not be the cause of drought tolerance, they seem to indicate the development of drought tolerance. Water stress history and plant age were the most critical factors controlling the apparent viscosity changes observed.