Premium
Prevalence of latex sensitization and allergy in Portuguese children
Author(s) -
Jorge Arminda,
Lorente Félix,
TabordaBarata Luís
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
pediatric allergy and immunology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.269
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1399-3038
pISSN - 0905-6157
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2006.00423.x
Subject(s) - latex allergy , medicine , allergy , sensitization , immunoglobulin e , population , radioallergosorbent test , dermatology , allergen , immunology , environmental health , antibody
The prevalence of latex allergy has been increasing not only in risk groups but also in the general population, where it is accepted to average 1%. In children, latex sensitization prevalence studies are scarce and involve different population sampling and allergy testing methods, which makes it difficult to compare across studies. Nevertheless, existing studies point towards a low prevalence of latex allergy in children, which still needs to be confirmed in the Portuguese population. Aiming at studying the prevalence of latex sensitization and allergy in a sample of Portuguese children, we studied 182 children from two different hospital outpatient clinics. A standardized questionnaire focusing on atopic background, previous history and allergic signs or symptoms on exposure to latex or fruits was given to all children and parents. Skin prick testing was performed with a battery of common aeroallergens as well as latex. Serum total IgE, Phadiatop, F × 5E and latex‐specific IgE were determined in all children. Specific IgE to latex‐crossreacting fruits was determined in latex‐sensitized children. Based upon the questionnaire, the prevalence of latex allergy would be 0.5%. The prevalence of latex sensitization would be 3.8%, when based solely upon skin prick testing, and 12.1% (≥0.35 IU/ml) or 6.6% (≥0.70 IU/ml) when based singly upon determination of latex‐specific IgE. When positive results for either test were considered, the prevalence of latex sensitization was 14.3%. All latex‐sensitized children were atopic. Sensitivity to latex‐crossreacting foodstuffs was demonstrated in 61.5% of latex‐sensitized children (16/26). This study shows that the prevalence of latex allergy and sensitization in Portuguese atopic and non‐atopic children, as analysed using various diagnostic methods, is similar to that observed in other countries. In addition, the assessment of latex allergy and sensitization should always include skin prick testing and determination of serum IgE.