z-logo
Premium
Novel WDR35 mutations in patients with cranioectodermal dysplasia (Sensenbrenner syndrome)
Author(s) -
Hoffer JL,
Fryssira H,
Konstantinidou AE,
Ropers H−H,
Tzschach A
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
clinical genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.543
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1399-0004
pISSN - 0009-9163
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01880.x
Subject(s) - mutation , genetics , dysplasia , content (measure theory) , medicine , computer science , computational biology , biology , gene , mathematics , mathematical analysis
To the Editor : Cranioectodermal dysplasia (CED, Sensenbrenner syndrome, OMIM 218330) is a rare autosomal recessive ciliopathy characterized by craniosynostosis, dolichocephaly, narrow chest, sparse hair, epicanthal folds, microdontia, brachydactyly, joint laxity, ophthalmological problems (nystagmus, myopia, and retinal dystrophy), nephronophthisis and cystic liver disease. CED is a genetically heterogeneous disorder, and mutations have been reported in IFT122, WDR35, C14orf179 and WDR19 (1–5). The products of all four genes are part of the intraflagellar transport complex A (IFT-A), a major complex for dynein-driven retrograde flagellar transport in cilia (6). Here, we report on the detection of novel WDR35 mutations in two unrelated CED patients. The clinical features of both patients are listed in Table 1. Patient 1 was born to remotely consanguineous Greek parents. She had short stature, short limbs, brachydactyly, dolichocephaly, frontal bossing, ptosis, micrognathia, high palate, low-set ears, fine sparse hair and dysplastic nails (Fig. 1a,b). Craniosynostosis was surgically corrected at the age of 2 months. Psychomotor development was retarded (walking at age 16 months and talking at age 2 years). X-ray examinations revealed narrow thorax with dysplastic ribs, bowed femora with abnormal epiphyses, short ulnae, brachydactyly, short metacarpals, short and bowed tibiae, short metatarsals and a triphalangeal hallux (Fig. 1c–e). Chronic renal failure was noticed in the first year of life. A brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan at the age of 2 years revealed a large cisterna magna and slight cortical atrophy. Patient 2 was born to non-consanguineous parents. She had dolichocephaly, craniosynostosis, bilateral nystagmus, short limbs, brachydactyly, fine sparse hair, frontal bossing, micrognathia, low-set ears and widely spaced teeth (Fig. 1f,g). Renal dysfunction was noted at the age of 14 months. She received a kidney transplant at the age of 5 years. Hepatic cystic disease was detected at the age of 4 years. Psychomotor development was delayed (walking at the age of 3 years and no words at the age of 5 years). A brain MRI scan at the age of 4 years revealed no abnormalities. In patient 1, analysis of the 28 coding exons and flanking intronic regions of WDR35 revealed a homozygous missense mutation (c.A2912G; p.Tyr971Cys) in exon 25 (Fig. S1a). Tyrosine at position 971 is a highly conserved amino acid with a PhyloP score of 0.996. Both parents were heterozygous carriers of the mutation. In patient 2, we detected a heterozygous missense mutation (c.T504A; p.Ser168Arg) in exon 6 which was inherited from the father and a heterozygous nonsense mutation in exon 18 (c.T1922G; p.Leu641X) which was inherited from the mother (Fig. S1b,c). Serine at position 168 is a highly conserved amino acid with a PhyloP score of 0.407. We excluded the presence of these mutations in 300 control chromosomes. To date, WDR35 mutations have only been reported in two other CED patients (2). Mutations in WDR35 have recently also been identified in fetuses with short rib-polydactyly syndrome (SRP) (5, 7). SRP affects the same organs as CED, but with much greater severity (Table 1). The milder phenotype in CED might be due to some residual function of the CED-associated WDR35 alleles. Functional studies will be needed to elucidate the biological consequences of different WDR35 mutations. Clinically, the two patients reported here share numerous features with those reported by Gilissen et al. (Table 1). Major clinical differences are developmental delay and the renal problems which were not reported in the Gilissen et al. patients. Additional patients with WDR35 mutations need to be identified to get more insight into the clinical variability of WDR35 associated CED and to establish comprehensive genotype–phenotype correlations. In conclusion, the patients reported here provide additional evidence that mutations in WDR35 are associated with CED, and they broaden the spectrum of clinical features. This will eventually also contribute to a better understanding of the function of the WDR35 gene product and its role in intraflagellar transport.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here