Premium
The post‐Human Genome Project mindset: race, reliability, and health care
Author(s) -
Kimmelman J
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
clinical genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.543
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1399-0004
pISSN - 0009-9163
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00706.x
Subject(s) - race (biology) , medical genetics , mindset , session (web analytics) , human genetics , genetics , diversity (politics) , public health , racism , psychology , sociology , biology , medicine , computer science , anthropology , gender studies , nursing , artificial intelligence , world wide web , gene
The following essay reports on the first session of a 2‐day workshop on genetic diversity and science communication, organized by the Institute of Genetics. I argue that the four talks in this session reflected two different facets of a ‘post‐Human Genome Project (HGP)’ view of human genetics. The first is characterized by an increasing interest in genetic differences. Two speakers – Troy Duster and Jasber Singh – expressed skepticism about one aspect of this trend: an emphasis on race in medicine and genetics. The other two speakers – Kenneth Weiss and Gustavo Turecki – spoke to a second facet of the post‐HGP view: a recognition of the difficulty in translating genetic discovery into medical or public health applications. Though both sets of talks were highly critical of current trends in genetic research, they pulled in opposite directions: one warned about the role of genetics in stabilizing racial categories, while the other lamented the failure of any genetic claims or categories to stabilize at all. I argue that the use of racial categories in medicine seems likely to encounter scientific, medical, and social challenges.