Premium
Commentary – Genetic diversity and science communication – some issues of ‘translation’ and language
Author(s) -
Richards MPM
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
clinical genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.543
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1399-0004
pISSN - 0009-9163
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00683.x
Subject(s) - salience (neuroscience) , diversity (politics) , ethnic group , genetics , sociology , epistemology , psychology , biology , cognitive psychology , anthropology , philosophy
This commentary concerns some key themes from the symposium. While molecular genetics may provide new opportunities to articulate biological concepts of race, the ideological baggage associated with the term suggests that it is best dropped from discussions. In screening programmes and genetic practice, ethnic identity is likely to be an uncertain surrogate to identify individuals with particular genetic variants. Precise language and explanation will aid communication about genetic matters. Talking of genes for particular traits or diseases is unhelpful. School teaching of classic Mendelian genetics is ineffective and should be replaced with some teaching of elementary developmental biology based on matters of everyday salience and interest. Social science literature is replete with unfounded claims of geneticization.