Premium
Quantitative measurement of extracellular histamine concentrations in intact human skin in vivo by the microdialysis technique: methodological aspects
Author(s) -
Petersen L. J.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
allergy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.363
H-Index - 173
eISSN - 1398-9995
pISSN - 0105-4538
DOI - 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb02598.x
Subject(s) - microdialysis , histamine , in vivo , chemistry , extracellular fluid , human skin , intradermal injection , extracellular , extravasation , pharmacology , chromatography , medicine , biochemistry , pathology , immunology , biology , genetics , microbiology and biotechnology
Petersen LJ. Quantitative measurement of extracellular histamine concentrations in intact human skin in vivo by the microdialysis technique: methodological aspects. Calculation of recovery is needed in microdialysis studies to calculate absolute concentrations of compounds in the extracellular water space. The purposes of this study were to determine the extracellular concentration of histamine in intact human skin in vivo and to study the validity of absolute histamine measurements during allergic skin reactions. A skin microdialysis technique and two calibration techniques, the no net flux method and the flow rate method, were used to quantify histamine concentrations in resting skin. To validate these techniques, skin glucose concentrations were analysed as well. In addition, the influence of vasodilation and plasma extravasation on recovery was followed after intradermal injection of codeine, a mast‐cell secretagogue. As expected, both calibration methods estimated skin glucose concentrations to be identical with venous blood glucose concentrations. However, skin histamine levels could not be calculated by the no net method, because the data did not meet the theoretic assumptions of this method. In contrast, histamine data fitted theoretically with the flow rate method, and skin histamine concentrations of 18.8±2.8 nM were found to be significantly greater than plasma histamine concentrations of 4.3±0.7 nM. Within minutes after intradermal injection of codeine, recovery increased significantly in a dose‐dependent fashion. Vasodilation per se did not influence recovery. In conclusion, absolute assessment of skin histamine concentrations can be made by microdialysis by the flow rate method. The validity of such an estimate and the theoretic prerequisites for the calculations are discussed. Quantitative measurement of skin histamine levels during allergic reactions cannot be performed since recovery is altered by plasma extravasation after skin challenge.