
From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning
Author(s) -
Gold Sara K. Tedford,
Abelson Julia,
Charles Cathy A.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
health expectations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1369-7625
pISSN - 1369-6513
DOI - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00334.x
Subject(s) - politics , rhetoric , public relations , neglect , health care , dominance (genetics) , public participation , qualitative research , nursing , political science , sociology , psychology , medicine , social science , philosophy , linguistics , biochemistry , chemistry , law , gene
Objective To explore the extent and manner of patient participation in the planning of regional supportive care networks throughout the province of Ontario. We consider the disconnect between the rhetoric and reality of patient involvement in network planning and co‐ordination. Context In 1997, the Province of Ontario, Canada, established a new, regionalized cancer care system. By transferring responsibility to the regional level and to networks, the architects of the new provincial system hoped to broaden participation in decision making and to enhance the responsiveness of decisions to communities. Research approach Through a qualitative, multiple case study approach we evaluated the processes of involving patients in network development. In‐depth, semi‐structured interviews and document analysis were complemented by observations of provincial meetings, regional council and network meetings. Results The network development processes in the three case study regions reveal a significant gap between intentions to involve patients in health planning and their actual involvement. This gap can be explained by: (i) a lack of clear direction regarding networks and patient participation in these networks; (ii) the dominance of regional cancer centres in network planning activities; and, (iii) the emergence of competing provincial priorities. Discussion These three trends expose the complexity of the notion of public participation and how it is embedded in social and political contexts. The failed attempt at involving patients in health planning efforts is the result of benign neglect of public participation intents and the social and political contexts in which public and patient participation is meant to occur.