Open AccessThe role of doctor's opinion in shared decision making: what does shared decision making really mean when considering invasive medical procedures? 1
Author(s) -
Mazur Dennis J.,
Hickam David H.,
Mazur Marcus D.,
Mazur Matthew D.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
health expectations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1369-7625
pISSN - 1369-6513
DOI - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00315.x
Subject(s) - decision aids , odds ratio , medicine , psychological intervention , context (archaeology) , patient participation , family medicine , preference , confidence interval , medical decision making , medline , alternative medicine , nursing , paleontology , pathology , political science , law , economics , biology , microeconomics
Objective The goal of this study was to gain understanding about patients’ perspectives on decision making in the context of invasive medical interventions and whether patients’ decision‐making preferences influenced the type of information they desired to be provided by physicians. Design Questionnaire study of consecutive patients in a university‐based general medicine clinic. Interventions Patients were presented with a randomized list of three types of information that physicians could provide (risk, benefit and physician's opinion on whether they should undergo the procedure). Patients were asked whether they preferred patient‐based, physician‐based, or shared decision making and then were asked to select which one or combination of these three information types was most important to them in their own decision making. Patients were also asked to self‐report on how many invasive procedures they had undergone in their own lives. Participants A total of 202 consecutive patients (mean age = 65.1 years, SD = 12.3, range 28–88; mean education 13.3 years, SD 2.9, range 2–23). Main outcome measures Patient reports. Results Of the 202 patients, two patients reported no decision‐making preference. These two patients were excluded from the analysis. Of the 200 remaining patients, 62.5% (125/200) preferred shared, 22.5%(45/200) preferred physician‐based, and 15.5% (31/200) preferred patient‐based decision making. More than half of all subjects chose physician opinion as the most important type of information for decision making. Older patients (odds ratio 1.028; confidence interval 1.003–1.053) were more likely to have ranked the doctor's opinion as the most important in their decision making for invasive medical interventions. Conclusions Although most patients want to share decision making with their physicians regarding invasive procedures, the majority of these patients report relying on the doctor's opinion on whether to undergo the procedure as the most important information in their own decision making.