Premium
SUPPLEMENTAL TESTS IN THE EVALUATION Of OCCUPATIONAL HAND DERMATITIS IN SOLDIERS
Author(s) -
WOLF RONNI,
MOVSHOWITZ MOSHE,
BRENNER SARAH
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
international journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-4632
pISSN - 0011-9059
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1996.tb01633.x
Subject(s) - medicine , patch test , contact dermatitis , hand dermatitis , test (biology) , patch testing , occupational dermatitis , occupational medicine , allergic contact dermatitis , contact allergy , dermatology , allergy , occupational exposure , environmental health , immunology , paleontology , biology
Background . Hand dermatitis in soldiers is a considerable problem. The purpose of the study was to evaluate appropriate screening tests to improve the diagnosis of hand dermatitis in soldiers. Materials and Methods . A group of 111 soldiers with occupational dermatitis from contact with fuels and oils underwent “tailored patch tests” with allergens relevant to their field of work and their environment. The control group consisted of 24 soldiers with various jobs similar to those of civilian life, who had not been exposed to oils and fuels. Seventy‐three civilian patients, attending the clinic for patch testing, were also included. Twenty soldiers, who had a history of intensive contact with oil and fuels, but no contact dermatitis, and who were admitted because of various skin diseases (fungal infections, acne, etc.) also underwent the supplemental testing and served as an additional control group. Results . Of the soldiers, 31 (29%) showed one or more positive skin tests of the oil series and 30 patients of this group one or more positive reactions to the standard patch tests trays. No patient of the control groups had a positive test to the oil series. Conclusions . Our results show the value of the supplementary tests as a first‐step screening test for detection of oil allergy in soldiers and automobile‐mechanics or in workers handling other gasoline‐ or diesel‐powered engineering equipment. The test method appears to be practical, easy to perform, reliable and giving clear and accurate results, with a negligible rate of false positive reactions.