z-logo
Premium
Response of Arabidopsis thaliana to 22 ALS inhibitors: baseline toxicity and cross‐resistance of csr1‐1 and csr1‐2 resistant mutants
Author(s) -
ROUX F,
MATEJICEK A,
REBOUD X
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
weed research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.693
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1365-3180
pISSN - 0043-1737
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2005.00450.x
Subject(s) - imazapyr , cross resistance , acetolactate synthase , arabidopsis thaliana , biology , mutant , herbicide resistance , toxicity , botany , genetics , chemistry , glyphosate , microbiology and biotechnology , weed , gene , organic chemistry
Summary The baseline toxicity of 22 acetolactate synthase (ALS)‐inhibiting herbicides and the cross‐resistance patterns of chlorsulfuron‐ and imazapyr‐resistant ( R ) lines on these 22 ALS‐inhibiting herbicides were investigated using the model species Arabidopsis thaliana . The 22 herbicides consisted of 18 sulfonylureas (SU), three imidazolinones (IMI) and one triazolopyrimidine (TP). The ED 50 values (doses of herbicides required to reduce dry matter by 50%) of the post‐emergence‐treated Col and Ler susceptible ( S ) lines ranged from 22 to 4822 mg ha −1 and from 17 to 3143 mg ha −1 respectively. The csr1‐1 chlorsulfuron‐resistant line (substitution of Pro 197 to Ser) conferred a high resistance to the only TP tested as well as to nine SU herbicides ( R : S ratio ≥30), a low resistance to two SU herbicides ( R : S ≥5 and <30) and little or no resistance to the three IMI and seven other SU herbicides ( R : S <5). This result contradicts the expectation that an ALS mutation selected by an SU herbicide confers high cross‐resistance to other SU herbicides. We found that the efficacy of specific ALS inhibitors was different for different species and therefore could not be predicted from our results with A. thaliana ; however, the cross‐resistance patterns in A. thaliana were highly correlated with cross‐resistance patterns in unrelated species with the same resistance mutation. These results have implications for resistance management.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here