z-logo
Premium
Presence and density of domestic mites in the microenvironment of mite‐sensitive dogs with atopic dermatitis
Author(s) -
Farmaki Rania,
Saridomichelakis Manolis N.,
Leontides Leonidas,
Papazahariadou Margarita G.,
Gioulekas Dimitrios,
Koutinas Alexander F.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
veterinary dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.744
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1365-3164
pISSN - 0959-4493
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2010.00891.x
Subject(s) - group b , mite , group a , atopic dermatitis , medicine , dust mites , veterinary medicine , zoology , house dust mite , allergen , biology , immunology , allergy , ecology
This study was designed to investigate the presence and density of domestic mites (DMs) in households with atopic dogs sensitive to these mites (group A; n  = 20), in households with clinically healthy, nonatopic dogs (group B; n  = 20) and in households without pets (group C; n  = 25). Dust samples were vacuum‐collected from the owner mattress (all groups) and dog sleeping area (groups A and B) or living room couch (group C) on four consecutive occasions, reflecting the four seasons of the year. DMs were found, at least once, in 19 of 20 (95%) group A, 13 of 20 (65%) group B and 21 of 25 (84%) group C households. DM numbers per gram of dust were 0–159 (median, 8.8), 0–302 (median, 3) and 0–1473 (median, 6.9) for group A, B and C, respectively. Dermatophagoides farinae predominated in all groups, since it was identified in 60% of group A, 40% of group B and 64% of group C households. Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus was found in 45%, 35% and 48% of households, in group A, B and C, respectively. No differences were found between households with (groups A and B) or without dogs (group C). When considering both sampling sites together, frequency of DM recovery was higher in group A than in group B ( P  = 0.044). Also, both mite frequency ( P  = 0.011) and density ( P  = 0.015) in dog sleeping area were higher in group A than in group B. In conclusion, presence and density of DMs is higher in the microenvironment of mite‐sensitive dogs with atopic dermatitis than in that of clinically healthy nonatopic dogs.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here