Premium
Pilot randomized trial of nutritional supplementation in patients with tuberculosis and HIV–tuberculosis coinfection receiving directly observed short‐course chemotherapy for tuberculosis
Author(s) -
Sudarsanam T. D.,
John J.,
Kang G.,
Mahendri V.,
Gerrior J.,
Franciosa M.,
Gopal S.,
John K. R.,
Wanke C. A.,
Muliyil J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
tropical medicine and international health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.056
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1365-3156
pISSN - 1360-2276
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02761.x
Subject(s) - medicine , tuberculosis , coinfection , randomized controlled trial , micronutrient , nutritional supplementation , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , immunology , pathology
Summary Objective To investigate the effects of nutritional supplementation on the outcome and nutritional status of south Indian patients with tuberculosis (TB) with and without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection on anti‐tuberculous therapy. Method Randomized controlled trial on the effect of a locally prepared cereal–lentil mixture providing 930 kcal and a multivitamin micronutrient supplement during anti‐tuberculous therapy in 81 newly diagnosed TB alone and 22 TB–HIV‐coinfected patients, among whom 51 received and 52 did not receive the supplement. The primary outcome evaluated at completion of TB therapy was outcome of TB treatment, as classified by the national programme. Secondary outcomes were body composition, compliance and condition on follow‐up 1 year after cessation of TB therapy and supplementation. Results There was no significant difference in TB outcomes at the end of treatment, but HIV–TB coinfected individuals had four times greater odds of poor outcome than those with TB alone. Among patients with TB, 1/35 (2.9%) supplemented and 5/42(12%) of those not supplemented had poor outcomes, while among TB–HIV‐coinfected individuals, 4/13 (31%) supplemented and 3/7 (42.8%) non‐supplemented patients had poor outcomes at the end of treatment, and the differences were more marked after 1 year of follow‐up. Although there was some trend of benefit for both TB alone and TB–HIV coinfection, the results were not statistically significant at the end of TB treatment, possibly because of limited sample size. Conclusion Nutritional supplements in patients are a potentially feasible, low‐cost intervention, which could impact patients with TB and TB–HIV. The public health importance of these diseases in resource‐limited settings suggests the need for large, multi‐centre randomized control trials on nutritional supplementation.