Premium
Multi‐modal Aedes aegypti mosquito reduction interventions and dengue fever prevention
Author(s) -
BallengerBrowning Kara K.,
Elder John P.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
tropical medicine and international health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.056
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1365-3156
pISSN - 1360-2276
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02396.x
Subject(s) - aedes aegypti , dengue fever , mosquito control , toxicology , aedes albopictus , aedes , environmental health , biology , population , larva , medicine , ecology , virology , malaria , immunology
Summary Objective To systematically review the effectiveness of biological, chemical and educational dengue fever prevention programs on the reduction of entomologic indicators. Methods Searches of PubMed, GoogleScholar, CabDirect databases and reference lists yielded over 1000 articles containing mosquito abatement interventions. Inclusion criteria were: Vector control programs targeting Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes; Studies providing pre‐ and post‐test data. Intervention effectiveness was assessed using Mulla’s formula to determine percent reductions for all studies with control groups. Twenty‐one studies were reviewed. Results Twelve dependent variables were presented, however, the Breteau, House and Container indices were the primary measurement tools for monitoring larval populations. Behavioural methods consisting of educational campaigns and maintaining water containers to reduce the mosquito population were applied in eight studies. Eight studies involved the use of biological methods such as predatory organisms or bacteria. Finally, eight studies used chemical control techniques including insecticide sprays, larvicides, insecticide‐treated materials, and cleaning water of containers with household chemicals with three studies using a combination of intervention techniques. Post‐intervention reduction in entomologic indices ranged from 100% to an increase of 13.9% from baseline. Conclsuion Little evidence exists to support the efficacy of mosquito abatement programs owing to poor study designs and lack of congruent entomologic indices. Creation of a standard entomological index, use of clustered and randomized‐controlled trials, and testing the generalizability of proven methods are recommended for future research.