Premium
Factors that motivate and hinder blood donation in Greece
Author(s) -
Marantidou O,
Loukopoulou L,
Zervou E,
Martinis G,
Egglezou A,
Fountouli P,
Dimoxenous P,
Parara M,
Gavalaki M,
Maniatis A
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
transfusion medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.471
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1365-3148
pISSN - 0958-7578
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00797.x
Subject(s) - donation , incentive , honesty , safer , medicine , blood transfusion , blood donor , demographics , perception , blood bank , family medicine , focus group , business , psychology , marketing , surgery , medical emergency , social psychology , political science , demography , immunology , computer security , neuroscience , sociology , computer science , law , economics , microeconomics
summary Donations in Greece are insufficient to cover the high transfusion needs arising from large numbers of thalassaemia and sickle cell anaemia patients and the implementation of new surgical techniques. Efforts to achieve self‐sufficiency, and to render blood supplies safer and manageable must focus on recruiting and retaining more volunteer donors and on converting the large pool of replacement donors. The aim of the study was to gain insight into public perception regarding the risks of donation and transfusion and to identify the factors that would motivate more people in Greece to regularly donate blood. Questionnaires were distributed to 1600 donors at the blood bank and visitors to hospitals at 11 locations across the country. Data on demographics, donation behaviour, incentives, risk perception and attitudes towards donation and transfusion were analysed separately for volunteer and replacement donors and non‐donors. The results showed that women and young people donate the least in Greece. Also, many donors do not donate because they are not reminded to. A small percentage of donors confessed to having concealed part of the truth to background questions. Overall, incentives to donate were considered important and included future availability of blood for self or family, paid leave from work and free blood tests. Recruitment and retention efforts should include better communication with current donors, and raising awareness among eligible donors. Staff should be educated in soliciting information from potential donors, and incentives should be better aligned to avoid conflict with ethical values and ensure honesty in the prescreening process.