Endopterygote systematics – where do we stand and what is the goal (Hexapoda, Arthropoda)?

.  Impressive progress has been made recently in the systematics of holometabolous insects. Nevertheless, important questions remain controversial, and uncertainties concerning the relationships of major lineages may even have increased. New analytical techniques have been developed and an immense wealth of molecular data has accumulated. Although no decisive breakthrough has yet been achieved, recent analyses of large molecular datasets have contributed greatly to the reconstruction of the phylogeny of several holometabolous lineages. Extensive combined analyses with substantial morphological datasets and molecular data comprising several genes (‘total evidence’) are still required for a well‐founded phylogenetic hypothesis for the entire group. Endopterygota monophyly is supported mainly by the specific and derived mode of development, which may be considered as a new evolutionary level within Hexapoda. The basal branching pattern remains controversial. A division into two large clades comprising Coleoptera (+ Strepsiptera?) + Neuropterida, on the one hand, and Hymenoptera + [Amphiesmenoptera + Antliophora (including Strepsiptera?)], on the other, appears plausible. Alternative hypotheses have been proposed based on wing characters and molecular data. The position of Strepsiptera remains unsolved. Mecoptera almost certainly is not monophyletic, as Siphonaptera are probably sister to Boreidae. Immense progress has been made in the reconstruction of the intraordinal relationships of all orders, thanks to increasing studies based on combined datasets. Common efforts of morphologists and molecular systematists probably will lead to further rapid progress. Several discoveries of new higher ranking taxa during recent years have revealed that large‐scale habitat destruction will not only have disastrous effects on global biodiversity, but also on the study of insect phylogeny and evolution.